APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

Equipment (Telescopes) - 折射、反射、折反射,各類天文望遠鏡的技術訊息

APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章

Lewis » 2011-04-16, 18:05

My friend(s) just received his/her Ethos :shock: 3.7mm with a 110º apparent field of view :shock: doing side-by-side A/B Test. We are going to compared with the expensive APM80/480 versus cheap Equinox 80/500.
We are going to focus on some leaves at the top of the mountain that APM is totally worth for that. Beside the colour resolution of the APM is much more sharper than Equinox and also it can't see any observable violet edge on APM.
Finally, we can concluded that the price is one of the factor to control the quality of telescope. :D

During the test, we found that other "Ethos" 10mm :shock: is still a little bit colour gradient change from centre to edge, those green colour becomes pale yellowish-green. Maybe we need to re-test again
附加檔案
IMAG0062.jpg
IMAG0062.jpg (698.58 KiB) 被瀏覽 9911 次
頭像
Lewis
 
文章: 380
註冊時間: 2010-02-03, 07:52

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章David » 2011-04-16, 20:01

This is very much consistent with what we found earlier in the artificial star tests on these two scopes earlier.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=763

For example, under blue 'star', the Equinox shows a halo rather than clear airy disk and diffraction ring(s). This shows that the equinox is very poorly corrected in blue. However, the APM80/480 still shows a nice airy disk plus a very dim first diffraction ring.
APM 80/480, SW 120mm Equinox, C8, Obsession 18"UC with Argo Navis & StellarCat
Lunt LS60T/CaK, LS152T with DSII
DMK31AF03, DMK21AF04, DBK21AF04
Mark V Binoviewer, Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 13mm), 19mm Panoptic, 5mm TMB mono
http://www.imsc.edu.hk/pages/astronomy
頭像
David
全域版主
 
文章: 1270
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 19:33

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章社長 » 2011-04-17, 09:04

Lewis 寫:We are going to focus on some leaves at the top of the mountain that APM is totally worth for that. Beside the colour resolution of the APM is much more sharper than Equinox and also it can't see any observable violet edge on APM.
Finally, we can concluded that the price is one of the factor to control the quality of telescope. :D


我的個人經驗,從天文觀測上,Sky Watcher Equinox 80這類優秀的ED鏡,跟頂級APO折射鏡APM 80/480的表現,分界線就在每mm口徑2x這傳統指標上。

例如兩鏡都是80mm口徑,特別是100x以下,很多人都會滿足其表現。但推上在160x以上,你會看到Equinox比APM的成像稍為柔化。

當付出5000元買一台80ED折射鏡,能在每mm口徑2x這傳統指標以內表現理想的,生產商已做足功夫,用戶也覺實物有所值了。

而頂級APO是設計作超指標工作的,例如我的203APO,是不時可以推上406x以上,跟David的18"UC競賽的,我們不時說18"UC的影像亮些,但不一定能反映那5x集光力的差距,而且就算在極理想的視寧度下,兩鏡的解像度也沒有很大分別。

問題是,APM 80/480的價格是Equinox 80的三倍以上,是否"totally worth",是見仁見智了。至少我經常跟人家說,對絶大多數人來說,是不應該考慮我的203APO的,反而一台100至130級APO,另加一台400級的牛反(Dobsonian或加個Equatorial platform都可以),應已足夠大多數用途。
兩個天文台 - 白鷺湖天文台、西藏自動化天文觀測站
主鏡 - Officina Stellare 500 口徑f3.8 RiFast攝星儀、APM/TMB 254 f9 APO、SkyWatcher Dob 18、305 f8.5 牛頓鏡、Paramount ME 赤道儀
配件 - 2 full sets of Supermonocentrics、Baader Mark V Binoviewer、Ethos、Canon 5D Mark II Mod、FLI Proline 16803冷凍相機、Mercedes SUV
星河科研社 http://www.astro.hk 電郵 saviofong@astro.hk
頭像
社長
Site Admin
 
文章: 12686
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 14:17
來自: 香港

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章willis » 2011-04-17, 17:00

Lewis 寫:My friend(s) just received his/her Ethos :shock: 3.7mm with a 110º apparent field of view :shock: doing side-by-side A/B Test. We are going to compared with the expensive APM80/480 versus cheap Equinox 80/500.
We are going to focus on some leaves at the top of the mountain that APM is totally worth for that. Beside the colour resolution of the APM is much more sharper than Equinox and also it can't see any observable violet edge on APM.
Finally, we can concluded that the price is one of the factor to control the quality of telescope. :D

During the test, we found that other "Ethos" 10mm :shock: is still a little bit colour gradient change from centre to edge, those green colour becomes pale yellowish-green. Maybe we need to re-test again



I learnt a lot from Equinox 80ED. It led me from novice to beginner.
http://willisao.blogspot.com/2010/11/my-first-m42.html
http://willisao.blogspot.com/2009/11/lunar-x.html
http://willisao.blogspot.com/2009/07/pl ... aging.html
http://willisao.blogspot.com/2009/07/bu ... n-day.html
I've seen many China made refractors of similar size. At this price level, Equinox is a good choice for sure. Certainly it cannot be compared with wrold class refractors. But u get more than what u paid. u know how I learn in the past two years as u go stargazing with me. So I wish u can utilize this good scope. :D
Tak FS60C, APM-LOMO 80/480, APM-TMB 105/650, SW Black Diamond 120ED, Borg 125SD, SW 12" Dobs , Lunt LS35T, Lunt LS80T
TMB Super Mono 4mm, Pentax XO 2.5mm, Baader Planetarium 8-24mm, Nagler (2-4mm, 3-6mm, 13mm), Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 10mm), Explore Scientific 100º (14mm, 20mm)
DBK 21, DMK 21, DMK 41, DMK 51, ASI 178MC
Nikon D810A, Canon 5D II, Fujifilm X-T10
頭像
willis
全域版主
 
文章: 1526
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 17:50
來自: HK

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章sharkfin » 2011-04-17, 21:52

"During the test, we found that other "Ethos" 10mm is still a little bit colour gradient change from centre to edge, those green colour becomes pale yellowish-green. Maybe we need to re-test again"


Is that mean Ethos 10mm is less good than 3.7?
sharkfin
 
文章: 43
註冊時間: 2010-05-05, 21:36

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章社長 » 2011-04-17, 23:12

噢,原來Lewis是Equinox 80新物主。

這鏡保值能力不俗,最近有一枝,用了近兩年轉了兩手,才從新價的4980跌至3800元。
兩個天文台 - 白鷺湖天文台、西藏自動化天文觀測站
主鏡 - Officina Stellare 500 口徑f3.8 RiFast攝星儀、APM/TMB 254 f9 APO、SkyWatcher Dob 18、305 f8.5 牛頓鏡、Paramount ME 赤道儀
配件 - 2 full sets of Supermonocentrics、Baader Mark V Binoviewer、Ethos、Canon 5D Mark II Mod、FLI Proline 16803冷凍相機、Mercedes SUV
星河科研社 http://www.astro.hk 電郵 saviofong@astro.hk
頭像
社長
Site Admin
 
文章: 12686
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 14:17
來自: 香港

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章willis » 2011-04-18, 20:23

Lewis 寫:During the test, we found that other "Ethos" 10mm :shock: is still a little bit colour gradient change from centre to edge, those green colour becomes pale yellowish-green. Maybe we need to re-test again


Lewis, I think u made a mistake. The one with some color is Ethos 3.7mm, not Ethos 10mm. There is a bit yellow gradient towards the edge. However, if one shifts the head a bit, the color will disappear. In addition, there is blue at the extreme edge and this will not go away even shifting one's head. I guess it is hard to observe the color if one do the observation in dark skies. We were doing bright terrestrial observation that day.
Tak FS60C, APM-LOMO 80/480, APM-TMB 105/650, SW Black Diamond 120ED, Borg 125SD, SW 12" Dobs , Lunt LS35T, Lunt LS80T
TMB Super Mono 4mm, Pentax XO 2.5mm, Baader Planetarium 8-24mm, Nagler (2-4mm, 3-6mm, 13mm), Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 10mm), Explore Scientific 100º (14mm, 20mm)
DBK 21, DMK 21, DMK 41, DMK 51, ASI 178MC
Nikon D810A, Canon 5D II, Fujifilm X-T10
頭像
willis
全域版主
 
文章: 1526
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 17:50
來自: HK

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章David » 2011-04-18, 22:12

willis 寫:Lewis, I think u made a mistake. The one with some color is Ethos 3.7mm, not Ethos 10mm. There is a bit yellow gradient towards the edge. However, if one shifts the head a bit, the color will disappear. In addition, there is blue at the extreme edge and this will not go away even shifting one's head. I guess it is hard to observe the color if one do the observation in dark skies. We were doing bright terrestrial observation that day.


I think I saw this colour gradient also with my 3.7 when observing the moon. I also notice the blue at the very extreme edge as mentioned here:
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=999
APM 80/480, SW 120mm Equinox, C8, Obsession 18"UC with Argo Navis & StellarCat
Lunt LS60T/CaK, LS152T with DSII
DMK31AF03, DMK21AF04, DBK21AF04
Mark V Binoviewer, Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 13mm), 19mm Panoptic, 5mm TMB mono
http://www.imsc.edu.hk/pages/astronomy
頭像
David
全域版主
 
文章: 1270
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 19:33

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章willis » 2011-04-19, 08:42

So all three 3.7mm showed similar phenomena. It is inherited in 3.7mm :? :? :?
Tak FS60C, APM-LOMO 80/480, APM-TMB 105/650, SW Black Diamond 120ED, Borg 125SD, SW 12" Dobs , Lunt LS35T, Lunt LS80T
TMB Super Mono 4mm, Pentax XO 2.5mm, Baader Planetarium 8-24mm, Nagler (2-4mm, 3-6mm, 13mm), Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 10mm), Explore Scientific 100º (14mm, 20mm)
DBK 21, DMK 21, DMK 41, DMK 51, ASI 178MC
Nikon D810A, Canon 5D II, Fujifilm X-T10
頭像
willis
全域版主
 
文章: 1526
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 17:50
來自: HK

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章xiaoer » 2011-04-19, 17:09

對,我前晚看月亮也有這個情況。哈哈,不過用來看H-alpha太陽伯伯就不會出現了。
今早趁上課前偷偷地看了一會,600/3.7 = 162倍的日珥好靚呀~~~
Meade 8", Skywatcher Equinox 80, Maxvision ED 80,A&M 80/600 APO, MT-130, LS-75F, LS-35THa, HEQ5Pro, LXD 75, P-2Z, mod 350D, mod ToUCam
xiaoer
 
文章: 66
註冊時間: 2010-02-03, 10:00

Re: APM80/480 vs Equinox 80/500

文章benben88 » 2011-04-20, 21:27

willis 寫:So all three 3.7mm showed similar phenomena. It is inherited in 3.7mm :? :? :?


It also appears in my ethos 8mm but I am ok with that :P
benben88
 
文章: 299
註冊時間: 2010-03-01, 18:50


回到 儀器 - 望遠鏡

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 10 位訪客

cron