1 頁 (共 1 頁)

My definition of large is 24" and up...

文章發表於 : 2011-09-23, 00:07
社長
這篇望遠鏡測試報告很有參考價值,只是語氣有點囂.... :lol:

看來David的18UC只是中口徑,我日後在西藏建立的24"才是大的起點。

http://www.astromart.com/articles/artic ... cle_id=829

Conclusion

1. The Paracorr 2 has no problem fixing the coma on a f/2.7 telescope.

2. If secondary mirrors get any larger, we are going to need new tools to align them.

3. The underdog, Mike Lockwood, made a great mirror that ran almost neck and neck vs. the more experienced Kennedy. A shoot out at the exact same focal length would be of much interest. (Hint, hint - Webster)

4. Vibration can be reliably measured and its causes identified by expensive equipment.

5. You are pronouncing the names of all of the stars incorrectly.

6. The Denk 2 binoviewers work admirably even at crazy fast focal ratios.

7. Seated observing with a 28" telescope is suddenly a reality.

8. 28" telescopes give great performances on Jupiter.

9. Large, high quality and very fast mirrors can snap into focus. Do not accept mush under the guise of it being a large mirror.

10. Practicing Muslims and Roman Catholics do not eat eagles - ever.

11. Flat footed observing with a 28" telescope. Wow, just wow.

Re: My definition of large is 24" and up...

文章發表於 : 2011-09-23, 23:11
kong
太毒了. 太毒了. 这简直就如葵花宝典嘛...

Re: My definition of large is 24" and up...

文章發表於 : 2011-09-24, 11:53
David
The red dobs is hot!
http://webstertelescopes.com/

Re: My definition of large is 24" and up...

文章發表於 : 2011-09-24, 16:42
社長
David buy one la, ah Ying will dress in red and help setup the telescope.

Re: My definition of large is 24" and up...

文章發表於 : 2011-09-24, 22:26
David
I don't mind dressing in red if Ah Ying buys one.