Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

Equipment (Telescopes) - 折射、反射、折反射,各類天文望遠鏡的技術訊息

Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章

willis » 2011-04-19, 22:50

Today I did solar observations two times, Ha in the morning & white light in the afternoon. The proms were big in the morning. In the afternoon, I used the Equinox 120ED to do high power magnification. I plugged the Ethos 3.7mm into it and resulting a magnification of 900/3.7=243x. The view was quite good. One of sudden I want to see the limit of my APM-LOMO 80/480. I tried the 3.7mm on 80/480, the image is good. However when I added an 2.5x Powermate on it, the magnification was 480/3.7x2.5=324x, the image was bad. After that I tried the Ethos 10mm and 5x Powermate on 80/480, the magnification was 480/10x5=240x, the image is better than that of 120ED & 3.7mm despite of a dimmer image!
附加檔案
RIMG0579.jpg
RIMG0579.jpg (122.24 KiB) 被瀏覽 7489 次
RIMG0576.jpg
RIMG0576.jpg (134.6 KiB) 被瀏覽 7489 次
RIMG0574.jpg
RIMG0574.jpg (130.54 KiB) 被瀏覽 7489 次
Tak FS60C, APM-LOMO 80/480, APM-TMB 105/650, SW Black Diamond 120ED, Borg 125SD, SW 12" Dobs , Lunt LS35T, Lunt LS80T
TMB Super Mono 4mm, Pentax XO 2.5mm, Baader Planetarium 8-24mm, Nagler (2-4mm, 3-6mm, 13mm), Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 10mm), Explore Scientific 100º (14mm, 20mm)
DBK 21, DMK 21, DMK 41, DMK 51, ASI 178MC
Nikon D810A, Canon 5D II, Fujifilm X-T10
頭像
willis
全域版主
 
文章: 1526
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 17:50
來自: HK

Re: Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章社長 » 2011-04-19, 23:17

you mean unexpected or expected performance of your 2nd hand heavily used APM 80/480? :mrgreen:
兩個天文台 - 白鷺湖天文台、西藏自動化天文觀測站
主鏡 - Officina Stellare 500 口徑f3.8 RiFast攝星儀、APM/TMB 254 f9 APO、SkyWatcher Dob 18、305 f8.5 牛頓鏡、Paramount ME 赤道儀
配件 - 2 full sets of Supermonocentrics、Baader Mark V Binoviewer、Ethos、Canon 5D Mark II Mod、FLI Proline 16803冷凍相機、Mercedes SUV
星河科研社 http://www.astro.hk 電郵 saviofong@astro.hk
頭像
社長
Site Admin
 
文章: 12686
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 14:17
來自: 香港

Re: Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章willis » 2011-04-19, 23:25

社長 寫:you mean unexpected or expected performance of your 2nd hand heavily used APM 80/480? :mrgreen:


I mean how come a 80mm refractor beats a 120mm refractor.... :lol: In order to be scientific, I need to do a side by side test. But I don't have two Herschel Wedge! :?
Tak FS60C, APM-LOMO 80/480, APM-TMB 105/650, SW Black Diamond 120ED, Borg 125SD, SW 12" Dobs , Lunt LS35T, Lunt LS80T
TMB Super Mono 4mm, Pentax XO 2.5mm, Baader Planetarium 8-24mm, Nagler (2-4mm, 3-6mm, 13mm), Ethos (3.7mm, 6mm, 10mm), Explore Scientific 100º (14mm, 20mm)
DBK 21, DMK 21, DMK 41, DMK 51, ASI 178MC
Nikon D810A, Canon 5D II, Fujifilm X-T10
頭像
willis
全域版主
 
文章: 1526
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 17:50
來自: HK

Re: Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章社長 » 2011-04-20, 01:37

實事求是,你說的"較好"是很主觀的,須要更深入的描述。

正如在路邊天文,我發現要讓路人有認為影像"較好",用上較大視場的目鏡,較長的eye relief,可以容下整個月面及預留一些空間的倍率,影像稍亮便可以,跟口徑及解像度無關的。
兩個天文台 - 白鷺湖天文台、西藏自動化天文觀測站
主鏡 - Officina Stellare 500 口徑f3.8 RiFast攝星儀、APM/TMB 254 f9 APO、SkyWatcher Dob 18、305 f8.5 牛頓鏡、Paramount ME 赤道儀
配件 - 2 full sets of Supermonocentrics、Baader Mark V Binoviewer、Ethos、Canon 5D Mark II Mod、FLI Proline 16803冷凍相機、Mercedes SUV
星河科研社 http://www.astro.hk 電郵 saviofong@astro.hk
頭像
社長
Site Admin
 
文章: 12686
註冊時間: 2010-02-01, 14:17
來自: 香港

Re: Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章sharkfin » 2011-04-20, 14:29

next time let us compare ethos 10 + 5x powermate and 2-4 nagler zoom using 80/480
and also compare ethos 3.7 and the 2-4 nagler zoom
sharkfin
 
文章: 43
註冊時間: 2010-05-05, 21:36

Re: Unexpected performance of APM-LOMO 80/480

文章Robin » 2011-05-11, 22:37

社長 寫:實事求是,你說的"較好"是很主觀的,須要更深入的描述。

正如在路邊天文,我發現要讓路人有認為影像"較好",用上較大視場的目鏡,較長的eye relief,可以容下整個月面及預留一些空間的倍率,影像稍亮便可以,跟口徑及解像度無關的。

对,而且大众通常不会停留太久,那个initial impression就要通过大视场和高亮度的物体来刺激出来。像是那些要观测一阵子才能欣赏的暗天体大众就不懂得欣赏了。
My blog: Astronomy Notes -- restoration in progress. :)
頭像
Robin
 
文章: 181
註冊時間: 2010-11-24, 16:22
來自: Kluang, Malaysia


回到 儀器 - 望遠鏡

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客

cron