benben88 寫:willis 寫:With post processing, flat field and dark frame etc are just like a lady wearing make-up. Otherwise, it is a lady wears no make-up. Anyway, it seems that there is CA. Is it comes from the corrector?
Flat field is a must in CCD photography , it can eliminate the shadows of dust on the image and correct the vignetting of the setup .
There should be no CA for the Televue comacorr (Badder coma corrector has tiny CA and also spherical aberration and I am not using it in CCD photography). The alignment of the frames is not that great but I don't know why everytime I use PHD in guiding , the star in each frame is round but the field shifts a bit between frames . So after 1 hour L frame captured, the field shifted quite a lot..... There is no such problem if I use the self- guider or ST4 in Maxim DL.
Hi Ben! I made an over-do statement. It should be post processing is just like a lady wearing make-up. However for the flat field, if the telescope & the flattener are optically excellent, there is no need to apply flat field in the processing. As 社長 mentioned "我在這裡的所有照片都沒有Dark沒有Flat的....." No kidding and I tried APM APOs with proper flattener, there is no need to apply flat field. There is no obvious vignetting in full frame DSLR. If u are talking about APS size DSLR, flat field becomes a waste of time.

I know some well-known astrographs, they really need flat field.

The word "Astrograph" becomes a comercial name. I suppose the field of an Astrograph should be reasonably flat. But the reality is not. I reckon the term astrograph should be defined by performance, not just a name. So flat field or not, depends on what telescope u are using.
Clear Skies!
Willis